Announcement PDF PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve ASX Release Buxton Resources Ltd (ASX: BUX, BUXO) 10 March 2026 Final Approvals Received for Madman Drill Program Buxton Resources Ltd is pleased to advise that key licences and regulatory approvals have been granted for the 100% owned Madman copper-gold Project. All permits are now in hand to commence site works and undertake the maiden drilling program. Exploration at Madman is targeting a "Havieron-style" discrete magnetic anomaly located approximately 220 metres below surface. Key Operational Milestones • Tenement Status: Miscellaneous Licence L69/67 is now Live. The rapid grant of L69/67 is a direct result of Buxton’s proactive engagement with the Mungarlu Ngurrarankatja Rirraunkaja Aboriginal Corporation (MNRAC). • Drill Pads, Camp & Track Construction Approval: Buxton’s two Programme of Work (PoW) applications (on E69/4182 & L69/67) have been approved. • Earthworks: Preparatory activities are scheduled to commence in early April 2026 to facilitate a two-hole deep diamond drilling campaign. • Drilling Contractor Secured: Buxton has engaged McKay Drilling to execute the maiden drilling program. Rig mobilisation is scheduled for mid-April. Buxton's Managing Director Marty Moloney commented "Buxton has a track record of making province-defining discoveries. With the rig secured and all permits in hand for our 100% owned Madman Project, we can again look forward to putting the first- ever drill holes into yet another exciting frontier target." Exploration Rationale The upcoming program targets a ~200 nT magnetic anomaly covering ~1 km² (Figure 1). The anomaly bears a striking resemblance to the Havieron gold-copper deposit, the third largest undeveloped underground gold reserve in Australia. Inversion modelling indicates the top of the Madman anomaly is located approximately 220 metres below surface (Figure 2). This modelling also indicates This Announcement is supported by a video overview from Managing Director Marty Moloney available on Buxton’s InvestorHub PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve the Madman anomaly has very similar magnetic remanence component to that reported at Havieronix . Madman is situated near the Marloo Fault, a major transcrustal structure on the western margin of the Paterson Orogen (Figure 3). Regional prospectivity is supported by nearby gold-barium mineralisation at Quadrio Lake and the GSWA Trainor 1 stratigraphic hole. Trainor 1 intersected a zone of quartz-pyrite veinlets with highly anomalous gold and pathfinder elements including tellurium, bismuth, and copper. Hyperspectral analysis of the Trainor 1 core indicates extensive bleaching and k-feldspar alteration is associated with the veining. The host rocks at Trainor 1 are likely to be the same that host the Madman magnetic anomaly. These observations indicate a large-scale, gold-bearing hydrothermal system has overprinted the Madman basement rocks, and the timing of this hydrothermal event is consistent with world-class copper-gold systems of the Paterson Orogen. Logistics and Forward Plan To facilitate the drilling program, Buxton will firstly improve approximately 6 km of track along an existing seismic line and then establish ~56 km of new access tracks along with drill pads & sumps and a camp pad. This work will be overseen by MNRAC Aboriginal Monitors and will commence as soon as is practicable. Buxton currently anticipates drilling activities will commence in mid-April, subject to weather conditions, Monitor and continuing rig availability. The maiden Madman drill program currently aims to test the geophysical anomaly with two deep mud rotary + diamond drill holes (Figure 2). Buxton has secured funding under WA Government Exploration Incentive Scheme co- award for up-to A$180,000 to offset the cost of this drill program. ---o0o--- This announcement is authorised by the Board of Buxton Resources Ltd. For further information, please contact: Martin Moloney Sam Wright Managing Director Company Secretary marty@buxtonresources.com.au sam@buxtonresources.com.au PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve About the Madman Project The Madman Project is focussed on a Havieron “look-a-like” ~200nT magnetic feature ~1 km2 in extent (Figure 1). Figure 1: GSWA statewide magnetic imagery comparing the Madman geophysical anomaly to the Havieron magnetic feature. Madman lies under shallow cover and close to the Marloo Fault – a major crustal boundary. The line of the cross section (Figure 2) is indicated. Madman is located 375 km northeast of Wiluna and is accessible via the Gunbarrel and Eagle Highways, then along a historic seismic line track in good condition. Buxton will be improving the last ~6 km of this seismic line, then establishing 56 km of new access tracks. Thorough review of historical records indicates there has been no previous on-ground exploration at Madman, including over the discrete geophysical anomaly which is the focus of initial exploration. The Project straddles the Marloo Fault, which is part of a major transcrustal structure that defines the western margin of the Paterson Orogeni (Figure 3). Prospectivity for gold is supported by records arising from a GSWA mapping program that resulted in the discovery of vein-hosted gold-barium mineralisation at the Quadrio Lake and Phenoclast Hill prospectsii . The nearby stratigraphic drillhole GSWA Trainor 1 intersected a zone of quartz-pyrite veinlets from 397.1 – 417.55 metres downhole with distinctly anomalous gold up to 33 ppb associated with tellurium up to 823 ppb (>800 times average crustal abundance), along with a suite of other anomalous pathfinder elements including arsenic (137 ppm), antimony (2.73 ppm), molybdenum (36 ppm), copper (402 ppm) and bismuth (772 ppb) iii & iv . PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Hyperspectral analysis of this drill core reveals extensive zones of bleaching and k-feldspar (assumed to represent alteration) enveloping the anomalous geochemistry, suggesting mineralisation is associated with an extensive hydrothermal eventv . The GSWA interprets the timing of the gold-related mineralisation and alteration event in the Madman region as being coeval with other deposits in the Paterson Orogen Au/Cu deposits (~650 Ma)vi including Telfer, Winu, Havieron and others which collectively represent over 34.6 million ounces of gold and 3.3 Mt coppervii . Over 50% of this gold endowment, and virtually all the copper, has been defined within the last decade underscoring the low exploration maturity of this highly prospective region. Buxton’s updated forward and inversion modelling of the Madman anomaly is based on recently released 200m lines spaced magnetics data. This modelling indicates the target is likely around 220 metres below surface (Figure 2). Buxton’s modelling also indicates a very similar magnetic remanence component to the Madman anomaly to that described at Havieronviii , supporting the interpretation that the two features share a similar timing. The initial drilling aims to test the Madman geophysical anomaly with two deep drill holes (Figure 2). To that end, Buxton has: - secured funding under WA Government Exploration Incentive Scheme co- award for up-to A$180,000 to offset the cost of this drill program (see ASX 01 May 2025). - completed heritage surveys for drill & camp pads and access track construction (see ASX 01 Jul 2025). PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Figure 2: Inversion modelling of the Madman magnetic coverage indicates the target is around 220m below surface. The image (cross section looking NW) illustrates the proposed exploration program, consisting of 2 deep drill holes (see Figure 1 for cross section location). PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Figure 3: Regional setting of the Madman Project showing the key supporting geological elements including the Marloo Fault and extensions and the nearby gold-bearing mineral occurrences at Quadrio Lake and in the GSWA Trainor 1 stratigraphic drillhole. The extent of the Paterson Orogen and related major mineral deposits is also shown. Buxton’s new application E 69/4283 will expand Buxton’s 100% owned tenure position to ~530 km2 on grant. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Competent Persons The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Martin Moloney. Mr. Moloney, (B. App Sc. Hons) is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Society of Economic Geologists. Mr Moloney is a full-time employee of Buxton Resources Ltd. Mr Moloney has sufficient experience which is relevant to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a “Competent Person” as defined in the 2012 edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Moloney consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears. Previously Reported Information - Madman There is information in this announcement relating to exploration results previously announced on: 1. 18 Mar 2025 – BUX Corporate Presentation 2. 01 May 2025 – Madman Project – EIS Drilling Grant Awarded 3. 01 Jul 2025 – Heritage Clearance Survey Completed at Madman Project 4. 16 Sep 2025 – Buxton Exploration Update 5. 02 Feb 2026 – Madman Project Advances Towards Maiden Drilling Validity of Referenced Results Buxton confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information from previous ASX Announcements which has been referenced in this Announcement. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve JORC Table: Section 1 – Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down-hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. The assay results presented in this release relate to a stratigraphic hole by GSWA in 1995 and resampled by FMG in 2022. The drilling used industry standard methods to produce diamond drill core from 5.8 metres to 709 metres (end of hole). All known details can be found in Stevens & Adamides (1998). Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Stevens & Adamides (1998) report that the hole GSWA Trainor 1 was drilled by Western Deep Hole Drilling using a UDR 1000 (Warman 1000 Mk 4) drill rig mounted on an 8 x 4 UD (Rig No. 5) as HQ (5.8m – 198.5m) and NQ2 diameter core (198.5 – 709m EOH). The hole was spudded on 1 Nov 1995 and completed on 10 Nov 1995. Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Stevens & Adamides (1998) report 100% recovery from 5.8 m to the end of hole at 709 m depth. Trainor 1 was drilled virtually trouble free, with excellent core recoveries in both the HQ and NQ cored intervals. The only significant problems were the need to dump and replace the mud at 454 m, and the relatively short coring runs achieved in the NQ hole due to fractured ground. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. See Stevens & Adamides (1998). Visual geological logging is supported by an extensive array of supporting data collection, including wireline logging, petrology, palynology, geochemistry and petrophysics. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Diamond drilling samples were collected for FMG from the GSWA core library under sampling approval P1492. GSWA technicians used a diamond core saw to provide quarter core or half core HQ samples from the highlighted drill intervals. GSWA did not report sample weights. GSWA sample lengths averaged 0.31 metres. FMG do not report sample weights or lengths. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. GSWA’s samples were analysed by AMDEL by ICP (IC3E and IC3M), XRF, and Fire Assay (see Stevens & Adamides (1998). FMG’s method records indicate their samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories for multielement geochemistry by ME-MS61L, ME-MS81 and ME-XRF26. FMG did not assay for gold. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. The geophysical inversion results discussed herein were generated using magnetic data recently made open-file by the GSWA (MAGIX RN71649). The “Madley A1” survey was acquired by Magspec Airborne Surveys in July 2020. The survey used a 200 m line spacing with 2000 m tie lines. A Cessna 210 fixed- wing aircraft was fitted with a tail sensor mounted in a stinger housing. Key specifications include • Model / Type - G-823A caesium vapour magnetometer • Resolution - 0.001 nT resolution • Sensitivity - 0.01 nT sensitivity • Sample Rate - 20 Hz (approximately 3.5 m) • Compensation - 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer • Integrated Novatel OEM719 DGPS receiver L1/L2 + GLONASS Multi Frequency / 555- channel Remanence characteristics of the Madman feature were interpreted by comparing magnetic inversion results from Geosoft (MVI) and UBC (susceptibility) models. Forward modelling in IGMAS+ software was then used to inform the interpretation of inversion results in relation to remanence measurements of Havieron drill core as published by Hanneson & Baxter 2022. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. Quality Control and Quality Assurance procedures were not reported by GSWA or FMG. GSWA reported results for 4 duplicate samples vs 28 primary samples and no blanks or standards. FMG did not report any duplicates, blanks or standards. Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. Not applicable – the release does not report significant intersections. The use of twinned holes. Not applicable – the release does not include new drilling results. GSWA did not drill any twin holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Unknown - GSWA did not specify these details in their reporting. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Assay data are presented as “up-to” values and are from three different samples from between 400.19 m – 415.45 metres downhole in GSWA Trainor 1 as follows: PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Operator Sample ID Depth Analyte Reported in Announcement Text FMG* D682617 400.19 Bi, Te, Sb GSWA 133283 410.10 As, Au, Mo GSWA 133284 415.45 Cu *FMG did not assay for gold. Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. GSWA do not record the survey methodology, handheld GPS accurate to +/- 100m is assumed. Specification of the grid system used. All figures are presented in GDA2020, MGA zone 51S. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. The quality of topographic control is deemed adequate for the reconnaissance nature of the results presented. Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. See tables and figures in the body of the release for sample locations. The sampling reported is reconnaissance in nature and is insufficient to establish any degree of geological grade continuity. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. The airborne magnetic survey lines were oriented 033- 121, approximately normal to the geological strike. The degree to which the sampling may bias the actual grade and extent of mineralisation is highly uncertain. GSWA Trainor 1 was drilled vertically. No structural orientation was undertaken. GSWA note that the zone of widespread fracturing between 137.7m and 158.8m downhole, in the Cornelia Formation is associated with thin quartz veining, local bleaching and fracture guided hematitic staining that is mainly oriented parallel to core axis. The orientation of this hole with respect to the mineralised structures is therefore highly likely to have introduced a sampling bias. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Neither GSWA nor FMG report the measures taken to ensure sample security. Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No Project-specific external audits or reviews have been undertaken. JORC Table: Section 2 – Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. BUX have a 100% interest in granted Exploration License E69/4182 and Miscellaneous License L69/67, and application E69/4356 which together form the Madman Project. No royalties encumber these tenements. The Project lies within the Birriliburu Determination Area. The Birriliburu Native Title Holders hold native title rights to the Determination Area including the right to possess, occupy, use and enjoy the land and waters of the Determination Area to the exclusion of all others. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Mungarlu Ngurrarankatja Rirraunkaja Aboriginal Corporation (MNRAC) is the RNTBC for this Determination. Central Desert Native Title Services (CDNTS) is authorised by MNRAC to act as its agent in the administration and implementation of agreements with exploration companies. Buxton has executed a Land Access Agreement with the MNR via CDNTS. A review of the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) online ACHIS identified no Aboriginal sites or places within the Project area. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. The tenement is in good standing with DMPE and there are no known impediments for exploration on this tenement. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Several exploration parties have held portions of the area covered by BUX tenure previously, however the only substantive / relevant work was by AusQuest Ltd, who flew the airborne magnetic survey discussed herein. No on-ground exploration for Cu/Au has been undertaken. Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. The Madman Project lies along the Marloo Fault, a major transcrustal structure which extends & links with the Vines Fault. Together these structures define the Western margin of the Paterson Orogen. The Madman Project magnetic anomaly is most likely situated either within rocks now assigned to a) the Neoproterozoic McFadden, or b) the Mesoproterozoic Cornelia Formation. These Proterozoic rocks are basement to the northwestern part of the Officer Basin. Isolated exposures of Cretaceous rocks of the Canning Basin cover these older successions which are in turn covered by the active dune system of the Gibson Desert. In Trainor-1, these pre-Officer rocks comprise the Cornelia Formation (equivalent to the Edmund Group), consisting predominantly of indurated shale with minor amounts of sandstone and chert. The majority of the unit was deposited in an offshore marine-shelf setting, but intervals with abundant pyrite and claystone suggest deposition in a euxinic barred basin. Numerous faults with both normal and reverse offsets were noted in the core. The strata have been gently folded with dips typically varying between 20° and 50°. Sitting unconformably above the Cornelia Formation is the McFadden Formation (equivalent of the Collier Group), which consists of a basal conglomerate and poorly sorted sandstone of the was deposited during a marine transgression. Overlying carbonate and interbedded shale and sandstone within the formation were deposited on a shallow-marine shelf. The basal clastic and carbonate. See Hocking et al (2020)ix for more information on the stratigraphy of the Madman area. Exploration at the Madman Project is focussed on a Havieron look-a-like magnetic anomaly. Supporting the prospectivity of this feature are reports of alteration, vein-style mineralisation (hosting gold) and pathfinder geochemical anomalism arising from GSWA’s mapping, stratigraphic drilling and regolith sampling 1996-2002 at the nearby Quadrio Lake and associated occurrences and from the GSWA Trainor 1 stratigraphic drillhole. The shallow depth of the magnetic inversion model suggests that a relatively inexpensive exploration program could be undertaken to test this target. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: FMG provide drillhole information in WAMEX A115509 and related statutory technical reports. The samples presented in this report come from GSWA Trainor 1, with coordinates in GDA2020, MGA zone 51S. Hole ID East (m) North (m) RL (m) TD (m) Dip Azi GSWA Trainor 1 473780 7287555 455 709 -90 360 o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. No data aggregation methods have been applied. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. The basis of reporting assay results is described above. GSWA and FMG sampling of GSWA Trainor 1 was highly selective and the results presented are not representative of the entire hole. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. See text and figures in body of release. Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. The reporting presented in this Release is intended to demonstrate the presence of mineralisation styles supporting the target deposit model. The data sources are open file and referenced below such that the sampling can be independently verified. Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. All exploration data which may be meaningful and material to the interpretation of the drilling results is presented within this release. Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). See text and figures in body of release. Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. See figures in body of release. PO Box 661 Nedlands WA 6009 15 Robinson Av Belmont WA 6104 T: 08-9380 6063 E: info@buxtonresources.com.au W: www.buxtonresources.com.au View online: https://buxtonresources.com.au/link/r8g9ve C